Brand new relationship ranging from fitness risk behavior and you may sexual positioning certainly one of an effective school-dependent decide to try out of teens

Brand new relationship ranging from fitness risk behavior and you may sexual positioning certainly one of an effective school-dependent decide to try out of teens

Garofalo, Roentgen., Wolf, Roentgen. C., Kessel, S., Palfrey, J., & Durant, Roentgen. H. (1998). Pediatrics, 101 (5), 895-902. doi: /peds.101.5.895

Gates, Grams. J. (2008). Diversity certainly one of same-gender partners in addition to their students. In the S. Coontz (Ed.) American Family members: Good Multicultural Viewer, New york, NY: Routledge.

GenIUSS Category. (2014). Recommendations to own Asking Inquiries to identify Transgender or other Intercourse Fraction Respondents toward Society-Created Studies. La, CA: The fresh new Williams Institute.

Goldman, Roentgen. (1996). Who is you to queer? Examining norms as much as sexuality, battle, and you may classification inside queer principle. In B. Beemyn & M. Eliason (Eds), Queer Degree: A Lesbian, Homosexual, Bisexual, and Transgender Anthology (pp. 169-182). Nyc, Ny : New york School Push.

Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. An effective., Tanis, J., Herman, J. L., Harrison, J., & Keisling, Meters. (2010). Federal Transgender Discrimination Questionnaire Post on Health insurance and Healthcare. Retrieved regarding

Environmentally friendly, R. J., Bettinger, Meters., & Zacks, Elizabeth. (1996). Is actually lesbian people fused and you will gay men partners disengaged? For the J. Laird & Roentgen. J. Environmentally friendly (Eds.), Lesbians and you will gays into the people and parents: A hands-on for practitioners (pp. 185-230). Bay area, Ca : Jossey-Bass.

National Center to possess Transgender Equivalence and National Lgbt Activity Push, Arizona, DC

Harkless, L. Age., & Fowers, B. J. (2005). Similarities and you will differences in relational borders certainly heterosexuals, homosexual guys, and you will lesbians. Therapy of women Every quarter, 29 (2), 167-176. xdoi: /j.1471-nine.x

Haseldon, L. & Joloza, T. (2009). Calculating intimate direction: Helpful information to have researchers. Newport, Southern area Wales https://besthookupwebsites.org/ts-dating-review/, UK: Place of work for National Statistics.

Herek, Grams. M. (1996). As to the reasons tell if you are not questioned? Self-revelation, intergroup get in touch with, and heterosexuals’ perceptions towards lesbians and you may homosexual men. Inside the G. M. Herek, J. B. Jobe, & Roentgen. Meters. Carney (Eds.), Call at force: Intimate direction and also the armed forces (pp. 197-225). Chi town, IL: College or university away from Chi town Drive.

Herek, G. Yards. Kimmel, D. C., Amaro, H., & Melton, G. B. (1991). Avoiding heterosexual prejudice inside emotional lookup. Western Psychologist, 46 (9), 957-963.

Institute of Treatments. (2011). The health of Lesbian, Homosexual, Bisexual, and you can Transgender Some body: Strengthening a charity to possess most readily useful information. Washington, DC: This new Federal Academies Force.

Healthy some one 2010: Lover document having lesbian, homosexual, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) fitness

Institute of Treatments. (2013). Collecting intimate orientation and you may intercourse title investigation in the electronic wellness ideas: Working area conclusion. Washington, DC: The brand new Federal Academies Push.

Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). Brand new public business off sexuality: Intimate strategies in the usa. Chicago, IL : College or university out-of Chicago Push.

Lee, J. (1996). As to the reasons Suzie Wong is not good lesbian: Asian and Asian American lesbian and bisexual people and you will femme/butch/sex identities. In B. Beemyn & M. Eliason (Eds.), Queer training: Good lesbian, gay, bisexual & transgender anthology (pp. 115-132). Ny, NY: Ny College or university Drive.

Absolutely nothing, Roentgen. J. An excellent., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical data having lost investigation (2nd ed.). Nyc, NY: Wiley.

). Psychological state correlates off sensed discrimination among lesbian, homosexual, and you can bisexual people in the us. American Record away from Societal Health, 91 (11), 1869-1876. doi: /AJPH.

Mikalson, P.; Pardo, S.; Green, J. (2012). First, Do Zero Damage: Reducing Disparities to have Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and you can Thinking Communities in California. Place of work of Wellness Equity, California Service of Social Fitness. Recovered of

Nadal, K. L., & Corpus, Meters. J. H. (2012). “Tomboys” and you will “Baklas”: Enjoy of lesbian and you may homosexual Filipino People in the us. Asian American Log from Therapy, 4 (3), 166-175. doi: /a0030168

Nardi, P. M., & Sherrod, D. (1994). Relationship regarding lifetime regarding gay men and you will lesbians. Record of Public and personal Dating, 11 (2) 185- 199. doi: 407594112002